licensing final decisions?

Jesse Tie Ten Quee highos at highos.com
Thu Sep 7 10:24:36 PDT 2000


Yo,

On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 12:23:57PM -0400, Bryan Dumm wrote:
> >From Mark Stone previous email(btw thx for the licensing info/details)
> 
>                Worried about hijacking   |   Not worried about hijacking
> Building from 
> source only          GPL, LGPL or MPL                BSD
> 
> Allow build from 
> some binaries        LGPL or MPL                     BSD

> Out of the two choices I think BSD makes the most sense. I am not 
> worried about hijacking or a commercial fork as much as us getting a 
> license and maintaining our copyright. Plus with a BSD license it will 
> be a whole boatload easier for proprietary programs to use alfs also. 
> I don't think alfs is going to be primarly binaries or proprietary programs
> by a longshot, I just don't think we should exclude them from alfs......

Agreed, BSD is what i'm voting for, unless someone gives me a better
reason.

> Anyways, have fun everyone, don't kill each other while I am gone. ;)

hrm... right *tries to remenber that*

-
Jesse Tie Ten Quee - highos at highos dot com





More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list