licensing final decisions?
Jesse Tie Ten Quee
highos at highos.com
Thu Sep 7 10:24:36 PDT 2000
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 12:23:57PM -0400, Bryan Dumm wrote:
> >From Mark Stone previous email(btw thx for the licensing info/details)
> Worried about hijacking | Not worried about hijacking
> Building from
> source only GPL, LGPL or MPL BSD
> Allow build from
> some binaries LGPL or MPL BSD
> Out of the two choices I think BSD makes the most sense. I am not
> worried about hijacking or a commercial fork as much as us getting a
> license and maintaining our copyright. Plus with a BSD license it will
> be a whole boatload easier for proprietary programs to use alfs also.
> I don't think alfs is going to be primarly binaries or proprietary programs
> by a longshot, I just don't think we should exclude them from alfs......
Agreed, BSD is what i'm voting for, unless someone gives me a better
> Anyways, have fun everyone, don't kill each other while I am gone. ;)
hrm... right *tries to remenber that*
Jesse Tie Ten Quee - highos at highos dot com
More information about the alfs-discuss