New element (<su> ?)
haski at sezampro.yu
Thu Feb 28 05:52:51 PST 2002
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 02:14:06PM +0100, Matthias Benkmann wrote:
> > <su username="lfs">
> > ...
> > </su>
It's worth mentioning that below <su> can be just about anything - only
parts of the <package>, the full <package>, several <package>s or the
whole LFS chapter 5 for example.
> I think for standard LFS this is too much. Standard LFS needs only a way
> to specify the default chapter 5 user and the default chapter 6 user.
> Specifying a user for every package is not very useful unless you're
> trying to support the package user concept, for which you would need more
> than just the above tag.
Well, I see two advantages - first is for the LFS book as it is now,
whose profile would only require putting the whole chapter 5 under <su>.
(I don't see any other solution for using that unprivileged user.)
The other one is a possibility not to compile packages with super-user
privileges, only install them when needed.
BTW, I didn't have time to check out your package users hint - I thought
something like the above would be enough for it, but I'm probably missing
something? It would be a great test for ALFS syntax to create a LFS profile
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss