Narrowing it down [Was: Name for the new tool]

Daniel Baumann daniel.baumann at
Fri Dec 17 09:30:57 PST 2004

Roel Neefs wrote:
> First some comments, I'm against calling it ALFS, calling it the same as 
> the project will be confusing as you never know which one is being 
> talked about, adding the n in front of it is indeed not logical, as 
> being said by Jeremy, if you looked at the poc code, you would see that 
> they don't use the ideas/code from nalfs. And the 2 at the end is 
> therefor also wrong, it isn't a successor of a first tool, it is a new 
> tool, build from scratch with new features/design/... . So giving it a 
> proper name to identify it, instead of a b-name seems more appropriate, 
> therefor my choice would be:

ack, but did anybody already suggest 'alfs-tool'?

it would be very generic though, maybe would be good for the beginning, 
where afterwards, it could be splittet up into more kiss-programms 
(alfs-packager, alfs-installer or whatever).

Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann at

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list