Narrowing it down [Was: Name for the new tool]

James Robertson jwrober at
Sun Dec 19 19:33:19 PST 2004

Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> I would 
> also like to hear some suggestions about the best way to number its 
> versions, so we can have that in mind from the start.

I think we can go from 1.x if we want, since you guys are going for 
complete rewrite.  I personally like the three part numbering scheme 
that we use on the current nALFS tool.  Betas are 0.x until 1.x is 
released and 1.0.x are patch revisions.

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list