Minor modification of profiles

James Robertson jwrober at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Feb 4 09:08:03 PST 2004

Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Sébastien wrote on 04 February 2004 14:41
>>First I'd like to thank you for the hard work on both nALFS and the
>>profiles, I think that having official profiles really improves (at
>>least my) ability in testing.
>>I've just tested the 5.1-pre1 everything is fine.
>>However, I'm working on a powerpc and I need to change the linker name
>>to ld.so.1 . I wonder if it could be made an entity defined in
>>general.ent rather than being hardcoded in both ch05/ch06
>>Since LFS is really portable (at least on powerpc), it seems logical to
>>define the dynamic linker's name in just one place, am I wrong?
> I personally can't see a problem with that but I'll wait to see what other
> people think. The more arch's we can easily support the better IMHO.

I think it an excellent idea.  This would really aid those with other

James Robertson -- jwrober at linuxfromscratch dot org
Reg. Linux User -- #160424 -- http://counter.li.org
Reg. LFS User   -- #6981   -- http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS Bugzilla Maintainer    -- http://{blfs-}bugs.linuxfromscratch.org

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list