LFS/BELFS merge heads up

Thomas Pegg thomasp at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon May 3 14:32:21 PDT 2004

On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 16:19, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Ha, you beat me to this Kevin, I was just thinking about how we were
going to handle this change.

> This is mostly for Thomas/Jamie... the BELFS->LFS merge is going to
> happen very soon (in the next 48 hours). When that happens the existing
> LFS profile needs to be branched as LFS-5.1, to match the branch that
> will be made in LFS CVS.
We currently do have a 5.1 branch, actually I think I need to backport
all current cvs changes to that branch, since matthew just released

> LFS CVS will also get an LFS-6.0 branch, which will contain _part_ of
> BELFS (everything except gcc-3.4.0, probably). We'll need to update the
> LFS profile to match (easy to do, since it's all in the BELFS profile),
And a good job you've done at keeping it up to date Kevin.
> then branch the profile again for LFS-6.0.
> Finally, the remainder of BELFS will go into LFS CVS HEAD, and the
> profile needs to be updated to match it.
> The new LFS structure will be somewhat like Debian:
> stable/testing/unstable. After this week, these will be:
> stable - LFS-5.1
> testing - LFS-6.0
> unstable - HEAD (LFS-6.1 target)
> I'll come up with some way to get the profile names and links on the web
> pages set up to match this structure.

LFS User : 4729 
Linux User : 298329 
warpcore - 16:27:44 up 18:43, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.21, 0.68
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/alfs-discuss/attachments/20040503/8e712c52/attachment.sig>

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list