BLFS profile status

Kevin P. Fleming kpfleming at
Sat May 22 17:26:23 PDT 2004

Thomas Pegg wrote:

> That's true, and after do some further research, it's not necessarily
> the & themselves but the fact the entities we use are not part of XML
> Spec, so tidy considers them unknown. Although there are very few files
> that contain & by itself, I think could still be used on a great
> majority of the files and those that may have trouble spots will just
> have to check over and correct tidy's errors.

One possibility is to define a new entity name for &amp that produces 
the same result, and then use that when you need a "real" & in the 
profile. That would mean that a simple search-replace after tidy would 
put all & back bare &.

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list