jhalfs-2639 optimization patch

M.Canales.es manuel at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat May 6 03:15:48 PDT 2006


El Sábado, 6 de Mayo de 2006 01:23, Jeremy Byron escribió:

> Yeah, seeing as that value wouldn't change packages (and really has
> nothing to do with them) it wouldn't make much sense being in with the
> optimization stuff.  Maybe just make it another command-line option
> and/or throw it in the common/config file?  Don't need anything fancy.

I prefer add it into the optimize code but as a separate setting and maybe 
using a separate function call.

It don't optimize the binaries, but optimize the build time.

>
> I'm still in the process of running the optimization tests; I set it to
> run 3 builds storing the reports and leave the last build with "-O 1"
> (for logs).

Well, the ICA/farce report for that last iteration should to show that almost 
all binaries differ ;-)

>
> I'll send you the reports when I get back from work if you want them.

Yes, send they to me.

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org



More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list