Problems with jhalfs

Per Arne Munthe lfs at peram.org
Sun Jul 29 11:59:17 PDT 2007


M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Domingo, 29 de Julio de 2007 15:27, Per Arne Munthe escribió:
>   
>> M.Canales.es wrote:
>>     
>>> gen_config.sh is not parsing properly packages file for you, but it works
>>> fine here.
>>>
>>> Is your packages file well generated? I.e, it must be a tabs-delimited
>>> list and start like
>>>       
>> This is what gets generated by entering make :
>>
>> -su-3.1$ head packages
>> 2.1
>> alsa    blfs-xml        1.0.13  1.0.13
>> gnome-core      blfs-xml        2.18.3
>> gnome-full      blfs-xml        2.18.3
>> kde-core        blfs-xml        3.5.6
>> kde-full        blfs-xml        3.5.6
>> kde-koffice     blfs-xml        1.6.1
>> xorg7   blfs-xml        7.2     7.2
>> fetchmail       blfs-xml/basicnet/mailnews/fetchmail.xml        6.3.4
>> mailx   blfs-xml/basicnet/mailnews/mailx.xml    12.2
>>
>>
>> note the 2.1 at the top...  is the been done changes to the required
>> support tools ?
>>     
>
> i think that that "2.1" come from some package you installed on a previous run 
> but that now generate_packages() is not able to place it in their proper 
> line.
>
> Could you send the output of this? (adjusting the path tou your $TRACKING_DIR 
> directory)
>
> find /var/lib/jhalfs/BLFS -name "*.2.1"
>
>   
Nope, that's not it :-(

    bash-3.1$ find /var/lib/jhalfs/BLFS -name "*.2.1"
    bash-3.1$ sudo find /var/lib/jhalfs/BLFS -name "*.2.1"
    Password:
    bash-3.1$

But i think I found the problem.  I had a *two* entries for which, one 
correct (which-2.16) and one incorrect (which-2.1).  I also got the same 
problem when I manually added entries for firefox and thunderbird that I 
had built manually.  But had 2.0.0.4 as the ending, and I then got this 
at the top of the packages file.

I know I added witch to /var/lib/jhals/BLFS manually as well as this is 
the closest I have for a overview of installed packages.

regs,

peram




More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list