SBU report

Thomas Pegg tom.pegg at
Thu Feb 23 18:26:11 PST 2012

On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:19 PM, Peter Palmer wrote:

> Hi,
> here a tiny fist patch (from myself) to fix the SBU report that wasn't
> running (current jhalfs svn and CLFS-1.2). I'm new to lfs/jhalfs
> development so I hope the format and everything is right and usable.
> Schedule of changes:
> 1. Variables needed initailising as perl was tipping over trying to
> substract without that, i.e.:
> INSTALLMB=`perl -e 'printf "%.3f" , ('$DU1MB' - '$DU1MBPREV')';`
> 2. The other change affects the selection of the very first entry of
> the $LOGS directory. In CLFS this was a script that run in fractions
> of a second... SBU is supposed to be based on the compilation time of
> binutils though.
> Any feedback appreciated.

The patch itself looks okay to me, but I am curious as to what errors you are seeing, especially in relation to your #1.


More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list