devfsd and glibc-2.2

scott thomason scott at industrial-linux.org
Sun Jan 14 11:58:42 PST 2001


By "cleaner" I mean to say "the way it was intended". I suspect that autoconf and cousins would have normally turned this on, but Richard Gooch probably didn't want to fiddle with that.
---scott

On Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:19:34 -0500, Sergey Ostrovsky said:
>  > Sergey, I think I have a cleaner fix for compiling devfsd with glibc-2.2:
>  
>  Might be, if if works. I mean to say, when fixing something I try to make as 
>  less changes as possible, to minimize side effects without getting too deep 
>  in dependensies. I just enabled missing definition and stopped on that.
>  Your way certainly looks cleaner.


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-apps-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the blfs-support mailing list