Open and closed source...

Steve Hayashi sth at
Wed Jan 17 18:28:10 PST 2001

I'm switching this over to apps.

I'll put this in a simple way.  Suppose, Microsoft HAD ripped the code of
someone else?  They could say, "so what are you going to do about
it?"  Very few people have the time and/or money to do battle with an
industry giant.  And if MS won, it could destroy the GNU community.

Frightening thought, isn't it?


On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Barry wrote:

> > Richard Bennett wrote:
> > 
> > Surely if someone creating a closed source product wanted to use a
> > reasonable amount of open source code there would be no real risk in
> > it for them. If they dont give out the source with their product, then
> > noone knows the code, and cant tell if it has been ripped off some
> > OpenSource project being developed elsewhere... for all we know
> > microsoft could have used linux code in the implementation of some of
> > their software... <sarc>(unlikely considering how stable good ol
> > windows is)</sarc>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  -- Richard Bennett
> quite true...
> however, should such a situation arise, and said companies wants to be
> bastardly about it...
> something COULD be done if it were found and that code were GPL'ed...
> BSD'ed, you've got nothing to stand on and even invited the act.
> Like I said... Don't get me wrong.  It's not a knock on people who
> support BSD or BSD style licenses.  Not at all.  I just think that those
> licensing schemes will come back to bite us later on.  Generosity is one
> thing.  Giving up everything to the corner bully without a fight is a
> little bit different.
> IMHO ... :)
> -- 
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message

Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-apps-request at
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message

More information about the blfs-support mailing list