Simon Geard delgarde at
Tue Jan 23 00:56:47 PST 2001

On Monday 22 January 2001 21:51, you wrote:
> >That should be fixed once newer versions of gcc provide proper support for
> >glibc 2.2.
> Shouldn't a library support a compiler and not the other way around?

I'm not an expert on it, but as I understand it, the compiler creates 
binaries which use the installed glibc. If the compiler doesn't correctly 
support the glibc version, it cannot do that.


Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-apps-request at
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message

More information about the blfs-support mailing list