Weird test-results from gcc-3.4.4
junk_mail at iol.ie
Wed Aug 24 07:43:41 PDT 2005
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> Can I build and install in /usr/local and then just move them
> all to /usr? Or is the path hardcoded in the binaries?
You can probably build all in /usr/local and _leave_ it in /usr/local
I ran a system with gcc-2.95-3 in /usr and gcc-3.3.1 in /usr/local. I
pointed the three variables ($CC $CXX $CPP) at the /usr/local version
and everything worked fine. If I wanted to use gcc-2.95, I could just
unset those and it would find /usr first in the path
The binaries seem to know where their libraries are - otherwise my
compiles would have barfed over compiling with the wrong gcc libs. So I
would not move compiled stuff to a different tree.
I also upgraded the cpu without reinstalling (k6/2 -->Athlon). So I
build on an i686 system but my compiler knew to use the libs at
In short, I've made nearly every conceivable attempt to bugger it, but
they just seem to work :-)).
With best Regards,
More information about the blfs-support