LFS is at 6.5 BLFS is at 6.3 Why?
stosss at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 13:41:10 PST 2009
> This just shows that you missed the point of the LFS project :
I understand the point of the LFS book
> And my attitude is not shitty as you say,
Yes it is!
"Hey, guys, your book
> sucks, if I did it myself, it would be much better, faster... etc.".
That was how you took my post that was not my intention.
> To answer your initial question, if you want a more up to date
> distribution instruction set, you may want to look at the CBLFS
Do you mean CLFS?
More information about the blfs-support