BLFS svn-20090928 Video Driver xf86-video-vesa-2.0.1.tar.bz2
gazza1z at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Oct 10 13:10:58 PDT 2009
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:43:02 +0100
> From: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop73 at googlemail.com>
> Subject: Re: BLFS svn-20090928 Video Driver
> To: BLFS Support List <blfs-support at linuxfromscratch.org>
> <ac790c4e0910091143v6ffe361bte1a0ec49ffb2bf9b at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 2009/10/9 ga ho <gazza1z at yahoo.co.uk>:
> > Thanks for the suggestions. I have an integrated ATI
> Radeon X1250 graphics chip and the fact that I might not
> need the vesa driver never occurred to me.
> >From 'man 4 radeon' shipped with
> SUPPORTED HARDWARE
> The radeon
> driver supports PCI, AGP, and PCIE
> video cards
> based on the following ATI
> [ skip first 27 chips ... ]
> Radeon X1200/X1250/X2100
> [ also skip subsequent lines for Radeon HD variants ]
> So I *assume* that the ati driver will work a lot better
> than the
> vesa driver on your hardware, even if the vesa driver is
> to drive your hardware.
> After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!"
That's really useful info. Never realised that ATI would have it's own man page. I suppose other graphics chips makers would also have a man page as well. Well that's common sense really.Now I can get a move on building X Windows.
More information about the blfs-support