[lfs-support] 70-persistent rules

Mike Johnston mkejohnston at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 10 14:05:05 PST 2013





----- Original Message -----
From: Michael E. Maher <michael at maheronline.co.uk>
To: Mike Johnston <mkejohnston at yahoo.com>
Cc: LFS Support List <lfs-support at linuxfromscratch.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 70-persistent rules



On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:40 -0800, Mike Johnston wrote:
> Any ideas from this?  I really appreciate your help on this.


>Everything looks good there, sorry I can think what might be wrong.
>There looks like another thread on this list that is a similar issue,
>does anything there help?

Ok so I found the thread you mentioned (I think).  It turns out if I rename the ports eth2 and eth3
it works perfectly.  I can switch either port to the eth2/eth3 or eth3/eth2 and all is good.

So what's the problem with naming with eth0/eth1 and just moving them around???

Any ideas?  Kinda of crazy


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page




More information about the lfs-support mailing list