bmike1 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 11:53:52 PST 2015
I think maybe a recompile from the section after glibc is in order. I say
the chapter after because it appears as if gibc compiled correctly. Not
hearing any responses by tomorrow I will assume the is agreement with my
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Michael Havens <bmike1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't deviate from the book though. I followed their instructions to
> the tee.
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:07 PM, William Harrington <kb0iic at berzerkula.org
> > wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:19:32 -0600
>> Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > the complete makelog is found:
>> > >
>> > > http://pastebin.com/GFtFP9Ng
>> > Well the lines like
>> > /tools/lib/libpthread.so.0: undefined reference to
>> `__getrlimit at GLIBC_PRIVATE'
>> All of the GLIBC_PRIVATE lines seem to me like you are attempting to use
>> LTO. Are you using LTO?
>> You are only one person out of many who can't build a complete system
>> without many errors which you can easily search the last ten years of
>> archives from many mailing lists. the LFS devs build every day but use book
>> commands and don't deviate from the book. When you need help you explain
>> your deviances from the book.
>> William Harrington
>> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
>> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>> Do not top post on this list.
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>> A: Top-posting.
>> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lfs-support