bookmarks/easier to quit/frame support
bet at mordor.net
Tue Nov 30 13:10:02 PST 1999
1999-11-30-15:51:53 mattack at area.com:
> Now that there seems to be good competition for Lynx, [...]
Hear, hear! I'm totally blown away by how much is how cool in Links. I have
begun attempting to understand the source code enough so I can hack it, but
it's been a way long time since I've done lots of C, it's slow going. If
anyone out there has assembled any roadmap-type notes to help someone get
oriented, I'd be grateful.
There are a few things I want badly enough to where I'm hoping to have a try
at adding them, assuming nobody else does 'em first:
- HTTP Basic Authentication
- Optional selectable links for inline images (so I can read
User Friendly with Links)
Get those done and I think I'll be able to retire Lynx. Joy!
> 1) Is there ANY bookmark support? Especially _using Lynx_ bookmarks, or
> even an external app to convert to and from Lynx bookmarks (so I can keep
> both up to date).
There are some more items on my list, which will take care of quite a few
issues, including bookmarks:
- Rebindable keys
- Builtin function (which can be bound to a key) to jump to an
arbitrary hard-coded URL;
- Builtin function (which ...) to invoke an external program with the
currently-selected URL as an argument; (with a suitable wrapper
script this might make a satisfactory temporary stopgap for mailto:
URLs until they get properly implemented);
- embedded scripting language to allow you to e.g. compose multiple
builtin functions into one, and of course bind the result to a key;
This approach would also allow you to e.g. rebind the keys that activate a
link (enter, right-arrow, ???) to use a wrapper function that
special-case-handles some url types (ooh --- mailto!) and passes the rest on
to the builtin url visiter. For an embeddable scripting language, I think
Lua looks pretty good; it is small enough that I think the code bloat it
would inflict is acceptable, and it's Really portable.
> 2) The REALLY annoying thing is how hard it is to quit links. I have to
> hit escape, wait [I don't understand why], hit down arrow, hit e.
> I wish I could just hit Q or :q, or just plain E.. whatever
Mikulas recently added "Q" to quit. I'm pretty sure it's in -current, don't
know about 0.81pre6. But before then I was using ^C, that also seemed to work
Is anybody else noticing that quitting seems to leave the cursor way over on
the right edge, so the next shell prompt wraps and leave a character or two
behind? Or is this peculiar to my environment (working on the raw console of a
laptop, in 50-line mode, under Red Hat 6.1, in a screen(1) session)?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the links-list