[links-list] Re: which xterm clone suits best (e)links ?

David B Harris dbarclay10 at yahoo.ca
Fri Apr 12 19:54:59 PDT 2002


On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:17:50 -0400
Matej Cepl <cepl.m at neu.edu> wrote:
> I understand what's your problem). And yes, rxvt has
> substantially smaller memory requirements and it is very living
> project (contrary to xterm, which is I believe basically dead).

I use rxvt myself, too, but xterm is far from dead. It has a dedicated
upstream, but they're committed to xterm being in "maintenance". That
means it's feature-complete. New features still creep in, though ;)

-- 
________________________________________________________________________
\ David B. Harris, Systems administrator   |   http://www.terrabox.com /
/  eelf at sympatico.ca, elf at terrabox.com     |     http://eelf.ddts.net  \
\======================================================================/
/ Clan Barclay motto: Aut agere, aut mori.  (Either action, or death.) \
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/links-list/attachments/20020412/15be8efd/attachment.sig>


More information about the links-list mailing list